Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Nick Hardt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Hardt analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Nick Hardt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wild 1 - 0 Hardt
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 48.8% of points on his second serve, while Hardt has won 47.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 51.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hardt has won 56.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.98% and 40.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 65.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hardt has saved 55.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 42/ 30), with Hardt winning 59.42% (W/L 41/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 192/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Hardt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 140/ 84), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.04% of matches (W/L 10/ 17), where as Hardt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wild winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wild winning 2 and Hardt winning 0. The last match between Wild and Hardt was at the Sao Leopoldo Challenger, 17-11-2022, Second, Clay with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wild and Hardt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wild winning 0 times and Hardt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wild winning 0, and Hardt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 214.69 while Hardt has played against players with an average rank of 315.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hardt has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 42.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hardt has converted 45.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
58
Rank
58
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
193
Rank
193
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (226-172)
Career Total W/L
61% (216-140)
50% (17-17)
YTD W/L
69% (31-14)
$678,730
Career Prize Money
$54,350
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Nick Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:4 | 1:11:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (26/42) | 60% (26/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (21/26) | 54% (14/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (22/43) | 24% (10/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nick Hardt
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Nick Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (17/17) | 69% (31/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (44/40) | 64% (68/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (400/390) | 55% (541/435) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 55% (6/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) | 74% (25/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 166 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 175 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:31 | 1:53:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.26 | 338.93 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1621/2578) | 66% (2057/3125) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1133/1621) | 64% (1326/2057) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (467/957) | 47% (503/1068) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (89/208) | 46% (198/434) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (871/2388) | 46% (1529/3293) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (6/10) | 75% (3/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (15/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (17/32) | 69% (31/45) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 75% (6/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 63% (10/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 90% (29/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 10% (29/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 31% (16/5) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
68 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
65%
(
31 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Gregoire Barrere
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nick Hardt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Nick Hardt
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
47%
(
48 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Nick Hardt
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Alexander Weis
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Nick Hardt
65%
(
73 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
106)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Enrico Dalla Valle
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nick Hardt
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
73%
(
90 of
123)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
57 of
90)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Hardt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
